similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to pixcube.at

Pixcube alternatives & similar sites

Animation Studio Schweiz | Motion Stories - Pixcube Animation Studio — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Computer Animation →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
romanmagin.at ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Roman Magin – Illustration – 2D Animation – Grafik-Design	Austria de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
haarmeier-doku.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Technische Animation	de	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jkid.co ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jkid==Motion Design	Colombia de	computer-animation WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreas-geier.info ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Andreas Geier • Grafik / Motion Design → Archiv	de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2agenten.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Illustration - 2agenten	de	computer-animation Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
creaturepark.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Creature Park \| Motiondesign & Illustration	Germany de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curlycutter.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Alexander Henkes – Cutter – Motion Graphics Designer	Germany de	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
bircken.design ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Laura Bircken - Motiondesign Portfolio	de	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tsaworks.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	WORK - STUDIO.TS	de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ubereck.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Start \| Uber Eck	de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
pxles.net ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Home - Chris Kasten	de	computer-animation WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jaschajascha.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Jascha Portfolio	de	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bramowli.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Lina Bramowski – Lina Bramowski	de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drtill.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	DrTill.de - Till Beckmann - DrTill	de	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robert-kuczera.com ↗	39 match 1 shared topics	HOME \| 3dcharacters \| 3d Animation Studio	de	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bold-dvd.com ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	Industriesauger-TV.de - Köln - 3D Animation, Visual Effects, Motiongraphics	de	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4dm-works.com ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	4DM-Works - Freelance 3D-Artist \| 3D DESIGN \| TECHNISCHE ANIMATION \| VISUALISIERUNG - Home	de	3-d-graphics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acolori.com ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	Acolori – 3D Animation und VFX Studio in Hamburg	de	3-d-graphics WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.