similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to philrobert.com

Philrobert alternatives & similar sites

Philippe Robert - Data Scientist — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
marionhaney.com ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	Marion Haney - Data Scientist	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jacobscott.io ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Jacob Scott - Data Science	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scrappydatascientist.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Patti Shih – Scrappy 💪 Data Scientist	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diakodarabi.org ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Diako Darabi — Data Scientist & Developer	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
paluvadisurya.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Paluvadi Surya \| Senior Product Data Scientist	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devynduvall.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Devyn Duvall — Data Scientist & Full-Stack Engineer	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skalas.me ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Skalas — Miguel Escalante — Data Scientist, Mathematician, Developer	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mathieuajaka.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Mathieu Ajaka – AI & Data Science Engineer	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesh.dev ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Data Science \| Machine Learning by JH	en	artificial-intelligence Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mejm.tech ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Michele Maestrini — Data Scientist \| Predictive Maintenance & Time Series Analysis	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomaswileman.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Thomas Wileman - Machine Learning & Data Science	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackroberts.ai ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Jack Roberts	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
ozteklab.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	OztekLab - Jean-Philippe Naiken	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skewedtromba.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	SkewedTromba \| Data Science & ML Engineering Journey	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
waterwaysdata.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Waterway Data – AI, Machine Learning, & Data Science	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dezyre.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	ProjectPro - Solved Big Data and Data Science Projects	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
derive.io ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Derive \| Data Science & Machine Learning \| Vishal Patel	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
devskrol.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	DevSkrol » Data Science Tutorials and Articles for Beginners	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.