similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to philosophyasscience.com

Philosophyasscience alternatives & similar sites

Philosophy as Science | The School of Brentano and the Rise of Scientific Philosophy — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
celsoneto.net ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Philosophy \| Celso Neto Philosophy	en	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elayshech.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Elay Shech \| Philosophy of Science & Physics, AI Ethics & Machine Learning	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyrilleimbert.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Cyrille Imbert – Senior Researcher (CNRS) in philosophy of science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
raphaelscholl.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Raphael Scholl – Philosopher and historian of science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
raphaelscholl.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Raphael Scholl – Philosopher and historian of science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
philofsci.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Philosophy of Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
philoneuro.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Philosophy & Neuroscience \| getting lost in science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7science.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	7Science — Something Scientific Is Coming	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catchthesciencebug.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Catch the Science Bug	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csindexbr.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	CSIndexbr: Exploring Brazilian Scientific Production in Computer Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aasjournal.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	The Journal of the Alabama Academy of Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katemaccord.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Kate MacCord – Historian and philosopher of science @ ASU	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbtiandscientificformulas.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	MBTI & Scientific Formulas \| Personality Psychology Meets Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nysci.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	New York Hall of Science \| NYSCI	en	science Craft CMS	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
einsteinandtesla.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Einstein and Nikola Tesla Scientific Foundation	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amse.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	American Museum of Science and Energy – Inspire the Imagination	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
asiascienceediting.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Asia Science Editing – Providers of Scientific Editing Services	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcdonnellinitiativeatmbl.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	McDonnell Initiative @MBL – Transforming discovery through collaborations among historians, philosophers, and life scientists	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.