similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to philosopherscocoon.com

Philosopherscocoon alternatives & similar sites

The Philosophers' Cocoon – A safe and supportive forum for philosophers. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
kayepos.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Kayepos: A School of Philosophy - Philosophy as Part of Life	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4philosophy.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	4Philosophy -- Search the World of Philosophy	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
philosoyousuf.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	philosoyousuf – Be a philosopher; but amid all your philosophy, be still a human. ~Hume	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherinemcdonald.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Catherine McDonald • Philosopher and Teacher, Melbourne AU	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
randomactsofcounseling.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Random Acts of Counseling – Creative ideas for research-based school behavior support	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
edcouragementor.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Edcouragementor – A Community Where Teachers Support Teachers	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bcodland.ca ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Brent C. Odland – PhD Student in Philosophy at McMaster University	Canada en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
edazoo.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Edazoo – a smarter way to support learners	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
phil168vip.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	PHIL168 - Explore Philosophy and Intellectual Insights for Curious Minds	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
philosopherben.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Philosopherben	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rcjones.me ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ROBERT C. JONES – PHILOSOPHER	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
philosopheasy.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Philosopheasy \| Substack	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
millennialpragmatist.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	the millennial pragmatist \| Philosopher-Jester \| Substack	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katharinejenkins.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Dr Katharine Jenkins \| Dr Katharine Jenkins - Philosopher	en	education Grav	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deoducefoundation.org.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Deo Duce Foundation – Supporting young people to achieve	United Kingdom en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaeeff.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Abilene Education Foundation – A Foundation for the students and teachers of Abilene ISD	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
michirunagatsu.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Michiru Nagatsu {長津　十} \| just another philosopher	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nzresearchforum.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	NZ Research Forum - The Expert Guide	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.