similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to philosopherben.com

Philosopherben alternatives & similar sites

Philosopherben — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
4thr.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Fourth R Applied Philosophy	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4philosophy.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	4Philosophy -- Search the World of Philosophy	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jacquelinebroad.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jacqueline Broad - Professor of Philosophy, Monash University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marioyuri.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mario Yuri Mota Lara - Philosophy & Mathematics \| Personal Website	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jaredhighlen.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jared Highlen – Ph.D. in Philosophy \| Boston College	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jameswilliamlincoln.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	James William Lincoln – Ethics, Social Philosophy, and Epistemology	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thezpill.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Z Pill — Reclaim Your Mind	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cspafrica.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Conversational Society of Philosophy – The Official Website	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dinosaursandcoffeepots.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	dinosaursandcoffeepots – Rhetoric, Critical Thinking and Other Obscurities.	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medialiteracyafrica.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Media Literacy Development Foundation – Nurturing critical media consumers and creators	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3wildboys.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	%3WildBoys help educate and learn about Economics, Philosophy, Literature, and Etymology	en	education Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
derbeelq8.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Derbeel Q8	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
weathervanetuition.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Weather Vane Tuition – english, history, politics & philosophy tuition in an oxbridge tutorial style	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mccc-union.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Massachusetts Community College Council – We Change Communities	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cthink.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	CThink Debates - CThink Debates	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
1stgenfuturelab.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	First Gen FutureLab	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dharpa.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	DHARPA	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
depaulacademy.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	DePaul Academy - Improving the lives of youth, families and communities	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.