similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to phenpedron.com

Phenpedron alternatives & similar sites

Phen Pedron — UX, Product & Engineering Leader — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jdevin.net ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Booysen - Product Engineer & Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alansaldivar.dev ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Saldivar Studio — Engineering Leadership & Product Development	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
tombenner.co ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Tom Benner \| Engineering Leader	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamklockars.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Adam Oscar Klockars — Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexgutierrez.tech ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Alex Gutierrez — Software Engineer & Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theworkprod.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Product, Design & Engineering Partner \| BlueInGreen	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thibault-david.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	David Thibault — Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adriansnelling.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Adrian Snelling \| Sr Frontend Developer & Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 5
alberto-prieto-lofkrantz.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Alberto Prieto Löfkrantz - Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
albertoprietolofkrantz.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Alberto Prieto Löfkrantz - Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
albertoprieto.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Alberto Prieto Löfkrantz - Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dev-shah.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Dev Shah \| Product, Design, Engineering, and Ideas	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
martinvasko.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Martin Vasko \| Data Scientist & Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackhumphrey.me ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Jack Humphrey, Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
timjohns.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Tim Johns - Software Engineering Leader & Entrepreneur	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamiekang.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jamie Kang — Engineering Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesrarthur.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	James R. Arthur \| Software Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
james-hankins.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	James Hankins — Full-Stack Engineer · Writer · Product	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.