similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to peterku.com

Peterku alternatives & similar sites

Peter Ku - EDA Infrastructure Engineer | Resume — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
robclarkey.net ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Rob Clarke – Infrastructure Engineer @ Google	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robclarkey.org ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Rob Clarke – Infrastructure Engineer @ Google	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robclarkey.me ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Rob Clarke – Infrastructure Engineer @ Google	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikehaertel.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Michael Haertel \| Technical Account Manager & Infrastructure Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dcadden.co.uk ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	biscuit.ninja - M7CFW — Ramblings of an IT Infrastructure Engineer	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gsfabian.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	G. Spencer Fabian — DevOps & Infrastructure Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cbxegypt.net ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	CBX \| Infrastructure for Scale	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catenary.digital ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Catenary Digital - Onchain Infrastructure Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
quantstratum.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	QuantStratum · Trading Infrastructure & Quantitative Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rhyte.io ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Rhyte - Engineering the Infrastructure of Tomorrow	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
9lx.app ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	9lx — Infrastructure & Projects	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rechat.cloud ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	ReChat - Enterprise Chat Infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reactr.tech ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Reactr — Fintech Core Infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ashoklabs.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Ashoklabs \| Notes on DevOps, platform engineering, and building reliable infrastructure.	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
tumitrust.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	TumiTrust - Portable Trust Infrastructure (PTI)	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elaineruchan.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Software Engineer \| Elaine Chan	en	technology-and-computing Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
obsrvr.io ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	OBSRVR - Mining infrastructure, your way	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gtmwithnik.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Nik L — Growth Infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.