similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to peter-hammond.com

Peter Hammond alternatives & similar sites

Peter Hammond - retired academic river pollution campaigner — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ang-appenzell.ch ↗	61 match 3 shared topics	Appenzellische Naturwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft (ANG)	Switzerland en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 6
algonauts.org ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	The Algonauts Project	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bio-c3.eu ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	Home - BIO-C3	European Union en	biological-sciences Liferay	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ourprimatepast.org ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Primate Evolution Resources	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meeg.org ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Marine Evolutionary Ecology Group – Professor Dustin Marshall’s research lab, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csl-unbc.org ↗	43 match 2 shared topics	Conservation Solutions Lab \| University of Northern British Columbia	en	environment Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cbd.int ↗	43 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Convention on Biological Diversity	en	biological-sciences Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
moriakiyasuhara.com ↗	43 match 2 shared topics	Yasuhara Lab \| Biodiversity & paleontology: an integrative macroecology, paleoecology, macroevolution, biogeography & paleoclimatology, PI Moriaki Yasuhara	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
citizenscience.org ↗	43 match 2 shared topics	AAPS - Association for Advancing Participatory Sciences	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
polidoro-swatlab.com ↗	43 match 2 shared topics	The Polidoro Lab has moved to Maryland! – University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (UMCES)	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allistercrow.com ↗	43 match 2 shared topics	Allister Crow - Google Scholar	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alignbio.org ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	The Align Foundation – Align to Innovate Public Research Data	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baywood-labs.com ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Baywood Labs	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcneishlab.org ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	The McNeish Laboratory	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mechaplantlab.org ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	MechaPlant Lab – The MechaPlant Lab headed by Yuchen Long in the National University of Singapore	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diegocasas.net ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Diego A. Casas	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shrinivaslab.com ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Shrinivas lab	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbrydegaard.com ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Biophotonic Sensing Group – Lund University	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.