similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to patrickrolwes.com

Patrickrolwes alternatives & similar sites

Patrick J. Rolwes — IO Psychology Researcher — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Human Resources →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
digwellresearch.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Digwell Research	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jens-thoemmes.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Jens Thoemmes - Sociologist & Research Professor	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aegishccp.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Aegis HCCP - Experts in Candidate Sourcing, Candidate Research & Recruitment Research	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bonelaconsulting.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	People Solutions & Psychometric Assessments	South Africa~ en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
360connectascent.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	360 Connect Ascent \| Alexis E. — Research & Introductions	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gamglobalservices.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	GAM Global Services — Recruitment & Executive Search, Middle East	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
outboundsearch.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Outbound Search	en	human-resources Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bondburry.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Bondburry — IT recruitment, executive search, and hiring support in India	India~ en	human-resources	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesdavidmartinez.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	JDM Research and Recruiting	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pacificsearchfirm.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	PACIFIC SEARCH FIRM	en	human-resources Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
savantrecruitment.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Savant \| Finance and Technology Search Specialist	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
smartgoals.cl ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Psychological Assessments for Effective Team Management	Chile en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bongenesearch.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Power Recruiting \| Top Talents for Top Enterprises – Bongene Search	en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sbaysearch.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - South Bay Search	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cumberlandsearch.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Cumberland Search	en	human-resources WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cssprosearch.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CSS ProSearch \| Sales, Marketing, Executive & Professional Recruiting	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5candidates.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	5 Candidates — The Recruiting Company	en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
venconresearch.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Salary Benchmarking for Consulting Firms - Vencon Research	Switzerland en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.