similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to parzerp.com

Parzerp alternatives & similar sites

Philipp Parzer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Design And Html →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
alvechy.dev ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Oleksandr Sh.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dwolfe.dev ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	d.wolfe \| Product + Design Engineer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deeepatel.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Deep Patel	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevinkipp.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Kevin Kipp	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevinomyonga.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Kevin Omyonga \| Full Stack Engineer And Designer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dejanblagic.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Dejan Blagic \| Experience and Interface Designer of Digital Products	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nadinejwalters.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	NadineJWalters – An invitation to read what I am thinking, doing, and wondering. Welcome!	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
glenpeterson.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Glen Peterson \| Glen Peterson	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stephenschoepfer.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Stephen Schoepfer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myl7.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Yulong Ming's Homepage	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aknin.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Itai Aknin - Product Designer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexiswatson.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Hi! I'm Alexis.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gaunt.me ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Matthew Gaunt	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ddossett.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	David Dossett	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abbeyhastings.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Abbey Hastings — Product \| Content	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaronmilton.design ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Aaron Milton — Product & Systems Designer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
willchassaing.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Will Chassaing	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abcomedia.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	nexora: Ultra-Modern Minimalist Landing Page \| Nexora	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.