similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to pacalways.org

Pacalways alternatives & similar sites

People About Change, Inc. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ctcdonate.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	CTC Causes \| Helping People Thru Change	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mboldenchange.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	mBOLDen CHANGE	United States~ en	non-profit-organizations Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
culturalexchangeoptions.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cultural Exchange Options, Inc.	United States~ en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1lifetime.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	One LIfe @ A Time, INC.	en	non-profit-organizations Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
p4pfoundation.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	People 4 People	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
motivatechanges.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Motivate Change	en	non-profit-organizations Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
measurablechange.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Measurable Change	en	non-profit-organizations Weebly WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahct.org.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	About us	United Kingdom en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bitud.org.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	About us	United Kingdom en	non-profit-organizations Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
3dbbuffalo.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	About us	United States~ en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mpchang.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Margaret and Peter Chang Foundation - About Us	United States~ en	non-profit-organizations Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lastingchangestartshere.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Lasting Change, Inc. \| Supporting Organization for Lifeline and Crosswinds	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lastingchangeinc.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Lasting Change, Inc. \| Supporting Organization for Lifeline and Crosswinds	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ourchangefoundation.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Our Change Foundation	United States~ en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
missouripeoplefirst.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Missouri People First	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2mfoundation.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	2M Foundation \| Bringing people and technology together to create change	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
changemakers.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Homepage \| Changemakers	en	non-profit-organizations Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abilitytochange.org.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ability to change: Home	United Kingdom en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.