similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to oxomind.com

Oxomind alternatives & similar sites

oXomind | Daniel Kanert – Aufgeschlossen! Ehrlich! Menschlich! — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Content Production →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
tatenteam.info ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Tatenteam – Content mit Haltung	de	content-production WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
foodkuss.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	FOODKUSS – DELICIOUS CREATIVITY	de	content-production WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nischenfinder.net ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Nischen-Finder – Deine TikTok-Nische in 60 Sekunden	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
avenyx.ch ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Avenyx – Professionelles OnlyFans-Management & Content	Switzerland de	content-production Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schindler-media.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Schindler Media – Ihre Wahl für Content & Consulting	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
czejka.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	René Czejka – Experienced Editor with a demonstrated history of working in the media production industry.	de	content-production WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4basedcreators.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	4based \| Finanzielle Freiheit gewinnen Wie 4based Content Creator stärkt und unterstützt	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
our-voices.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	- Perspektiven sichtbar machen	de	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deinlife.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Home - LiFE	de	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
main-content.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	main-content.net / main content	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
immobilieninfos-ingolstadt.de ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Michael Stadik - Editor Redakteur	Germany de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
in-season.de ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	storyboard GmbH	Germany de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4ten-records.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - The HEG.digital	de	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ugcleonie.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Leonie Wulf	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
angusmedia.ch ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Angus Media - Office Management, Texterin, Videoproduktionen	Switzerland de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4based-premium.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	4based vs.Traditionelle Plattformen	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4basedapp.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	4based - die Lösung für Content Creators	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bevise-consulting.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Bevise-consulting.com -Storytelling, Content Strategie	de	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.