similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to ovir.net

Ovir alternatives & similar sites

OVIR.net - Offline Verifiable Inference Runtime Network — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
dgrid.ai ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	DGrid.AI: Decentralized AI Inference Network	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
polarpeer.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	PolarPeer — Distributed AI Inference Mesh	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
poorpaul.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	poorpaul.dev — Open LLM Inference Benchmarks	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
conferenceleaderai.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Conference Leader AI - Conference Intelligence	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
computecreditindex.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Reference Rates · CCIR	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shyamdurai.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Shyam Duraiswami \| Verifiable Data, AI, and Distributed Systems	Switzerland~ en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ottorouter.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	OttoRouter — AI Inference Proxy on Solana	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
2ndlawai.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	2ndlaw \| Governed Inference & Epistemic Research for AI	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2ndlaw.ai ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	2ndlaw \| Governed Inference & Epistemic Research for AI	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2ndlawai.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	2ndlaw \| Governed Inference & Epistemic Research for AI	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
koromanda.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Koromanda — Deployable Power Network for AI Infrastructure	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lambdafields.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	LambdaFields – probabilistic inference systems for complex, real-world problems	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
2dn.ai ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	DeepNet Discovery Network (2DN)	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kraqx.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	KRAQX · Inference Silicon & OS	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bayesianguide.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Bayesian Inference for Probabilistic Risk Assessment	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
conference-space.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ConferenceAI	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
owlops.cloud ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Owlops — Hoot-driven DevOps \| Durable AI-agent runtime for DevOps	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
campnetwork.xyz ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Camp Network	en	artificial-intelligence Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.