similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to osscar.dev

Osscar alternatives & similar sites

OSSCAR — Fastest-Growing Open Source Orgs — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
a8s.app ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	\| Modern Open Source URL shortener.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prepdocnetwork.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Prepared Docs: Open Source Document Repository	en	technology-and-computing Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aberwiki.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Aberwiki \| Open Source Wiki Platform	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iconbrew.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	IconBrew - Open source icons for everyone	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blockcore.ca ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Blockcore - Open Source Blockchain Development Platform	Canada en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cartography.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Cartography - Open Source Infrastructure Mapping Tool	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
igalia.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Igalia - Open Source Consulting and Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kanonical.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Trusted open source for enterprises \| Canonical	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kanonical.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Trusted open source for enterprises \| Canonical	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kanonikal.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Trusted open source for enterprises \| Canonical	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kanonikal.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Trusted open source for enterprises \| Canonical	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fieldwave.co.uk ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Trusted open source for enterprises \| Canonical	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trebut.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Trebut \| Open Source Services	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
canonical.com.au ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Trusted open source for enterprises \| Canonical	Australia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jwheel.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Justin Wheeler — Building the human infrastructure of open source	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jwf.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Justin Wheeler — Building the human infrastructure of open source	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zoomment.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Zoomment: Empower Your Website with Open Source Commenting Widget	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pretenst.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Open Source Tensegrity \| PretensT	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.