similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to openhistograms.com

Openhistograms alternatives & similar sites

Vendor-neutral log-linear histograms | OpenHistogram — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Databases →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
lampyre.io ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Lampyre: Data analysis & OSINT tool for everyone	en	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ontopic.ai ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Ontopic, we make data actually usable	Italy~ en	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ontoic.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	IcebergDocs	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
towards-ds.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Towards Decision Science	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
towardecisionscience.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Towards Decision Science	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thiagob.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Thiago Baptista \| Engineer. Builder. Problem Solver.	en	technology-and-computing Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lamech.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Lamech Bob-Manuel \| Data Professional	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxpool.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxcell.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxwall.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxconcepts.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxfaqs.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxglobe.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxkiss.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxlady.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxlover.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxmen.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxmotion.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.