similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to openframebox.com

Openframebox alternatives & similar sites

Open Framebox - Open Source Go Packages — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
csharp-source.net ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Open Source Software in C#	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codecompass.net ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	CodeCompass: An Open Software Comprehension Framework	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codecover.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	CodeCover - an open-source glass-box testing tool	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codelite.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	CodeLite • A free, Open Source, Cross Platform C,C++,PHP and Node.js IDE	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
spapy.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	SpaPy – The One-Stop Spatial Python Package	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
noiseframework.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Noise Framework	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cocotb.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	cocotb \| Python verification framework	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
spockframework.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Spock Framework - the enterprise-ready specification framework	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cmocka.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	cmocka - unit testing framework for C	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
awry.cc ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Awry \| A Behavior-Driven Test Framework for C	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
specsy.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Specsy - unit testing framework, safely isolates mutable state	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codeconverter.io ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Convert your code to any language or framework effortlessly.	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nksatlas.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	The Wolfram Atlas of Simple Programs	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alkeyword.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Alkeyword - Observable Type Safety for Elixir	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ousewashes.org.uk ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Ohjelmistosuunnittelumallit suomalaisille kehittäjille - Ousewashes	United Kingdom en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vitalyobukhov.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Vitaly Obukhov - Tbilisi, Georgia, Intermedia.NET, South Russian State Polytechnic University \| about.me	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amxx.studio ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	AMX Studio - Web IDE for AMX Mod X	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
apl2000.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	APL2000 » Home	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.