similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to opencrafter.com

Opencrafter alternatives & similar sites

LaunchFaster by OpenKan — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
hornandholland.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Launchpad — Ship faster. Scale smarter.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
astertom.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Astertom	en	software-and-applications Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inversion-solutions.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	3X Faster Utility Pole Data Collection Software	United States~ en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neilopena.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Neil Opena	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 10
dotnetsaas.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	.NET SaaS - Ship your .NET SaaS faster	en	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neo3-preview.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Neo3 Preview Explorer by COZ	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eklor-by-abc.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	EklOr By ABC - Home	en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1sat.app ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	1Sat — The Browser Built for the Open Web	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dorustree.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Dorustree: Software Development Company	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
horyzontools.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Horyzon Tools - Unity Editor Tools for Faster Development	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csbuild.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	CSBuild \| Build Better · Build Faster · Build Smarter	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystex.app ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Crystex Launchpad \| Utility-First Launches on Ethereum	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
equinoxoli.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Equinox Open Library Initiative	en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
equinoxoli.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Equinox Open Library Initiative	en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
asteriaforge.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Asteria Forge - Build Once, Last Forever	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intricaretech.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	SaaS Product & Service Company \| Intricare Technologies	India~ en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
litoglass.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Moolex \| Sphiverse — Pending CA‑System v.5 Launch	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neonvil.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Neonvil - the new standard of software \| from idea to production faster than ever	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.