similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to opaque-auth.com

Opaque Auth alternatives & similar sites

Opaque - JavaScript implementation of the OPAQUE protocol – Opaque — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
internet-security-scan.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Free javascript security scan of full organization in one click	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agileit.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home - Agile IT \| CMMC Compliance & GCC High Implementation	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
psyprotocol.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Psy Protocol – the trustless, decentralized internet at scale	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qedprotocol.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	QED Protocol – the trustless, decentralized internet at scale	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wap1bb.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	WAP1BB – Wireless application protocol, misuse	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0-click.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	SYNAPSE PROTOCOL	sk	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atl-protocol.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Introduction \| ATL Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
baseline-protocol.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Baseline Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
void-eip.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	VOID Protocol — Trustless Infrastructure	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wakweli.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Wakweli - Protocol of Certification for a Secure Tokenized Future	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
attestr.app ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Attestr - Mutual Agreement Protocol on Nostr	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a3aprotocol.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	A3A Protocol - Fiducia	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atlas-protocol.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Atlas Protocol — Internet in its final form	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hrkh.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Domain Name Protection – Improbus	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hrkh.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Domain Name Protection – Improbus	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
litprotocol.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Lit Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
protocol-explorer.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Token Protocol Explorer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ariaprotocol.xyz ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Aria Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.