similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to ongiving.com

Ongiving alternatives & similar sites

Ongiving - Te ayudamos a que ayudes — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
effort.giving ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	effortX giving - Transparent Charity Donations	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
effortx.giving ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	effortX giving - Transparent Charity Donations	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giving.eu ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Giving Europe	European Union en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
egivingcenter.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	eGiving Center	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rosengivesback.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	A Culture of Giving - Rosen Gives Back - Harris Rosen	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100womenofwhatcom.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	\| Simply Giving	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sparkbond.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Just Keep on Living Inc	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
legacyforgood.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Planned Giving For Non Profits	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2egiving.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Tuohy Giving Foundation	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
navb.org.uk ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Volunteering - www.navb.org.uk	United Kingdom en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beyond.charity ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Beyond: The Worlds Most Meaningful Giving Experience	en	non-profit-organizations	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
360giving.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Homepage - 360Giving	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100plusspringfield.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	100+ Who Care in Springfield – Giving Hub	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
newleaf-asp.co.uk ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	New Leaf \| Giving Everyone A Chance	United Kingdom en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brightborn.foundation ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	BrightBorn Foundation \| Giving Forward	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mckinneycommunityfoundation.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Where Giving Thrives - Communities Foundation Of Texas	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100womenoceanside.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	100 Women Who Care Oceanside \| Giving circle	en	non-profit-organizations Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carefortexas.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Where Giving Thrives - Communities Foundation Of Texas	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.