similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to onepermonth.io

Onepermonth alternatives & similar sites

OnePerMonth — One Project. Every Month. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
24hundredproject.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	24 Hundred Project — Help Build the Next Weird Machine	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mixedcontent.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	MixedContent • No project too small, no fee too large	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mjdc.io ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Michael Conroy — mjdc.io	en	technology-and-computing Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
shaunwillis.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Shaun Willis — Co-Founder, Product Engineer & SaaS Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shaunwmusic.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Shaun Willis — Co-Founder, Product Engineer & SaaS Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikelpaz.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Michael Paz — Engineering Head \| Startup CTO & Founding Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
egeuysal.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Ege Uysal	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ashudubey.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Weekly discussions on product, growth and web3 by an ex-Linkedin product leader and entrepreneur, Ashu Dubey	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keelroot.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	keelroot — Mission-critical software for funded founders	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shootclaw.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	ShootClaw — Launch Your OpenClaw Wrapper Fast \| Full Source Code $99	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sisenshift.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	SisenShift	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
charlieswinhoe.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Charlie Swinhoe \| Founder & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
philipparvaneh.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Phil's Haus	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctopartner.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	CTOpartner \| CTO-as-a-Service & Production Systems Partner	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shipdayone.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Ship Day One \| Ship your startup in days, not weeks	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quan2m.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Allison Mahmood	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shipyardstudios.io ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Building Indie Apps At Shipyard Studios \| Mike Gilroy \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shakybits.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Sharad Kohli - shakybits.com	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.