similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to ohf.dk

Ohf alternatives & similar sites

Forside — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ctif.dk ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	Forside	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corselitze.dk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Forside - Corselitze	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medlemsservice.nu ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Medlemsservice.nu – Supportside for Medlemsservice	da	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ansoeg.nu ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Grant Compass \| Effektiv fondsadministration og ansøgningssystem	da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
africandevelopmentandrelieffoundationadrf.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	ADRF — African Development And Relief Foundation	da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
matoydsl.fo ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Minka um matoyðsl	da	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3f.dk ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	3F fagforening og a-kasse - 3F	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
akademikerne.dk ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Akademikerne - Akademikerne	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bl.dk ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	BL - Danmarks Almene Boliger	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cowifonden.dk ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Engaged ownership makes a difference	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
creceafonden.dk ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Velkommen til CRECEA Fonden	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crossingborders.dk ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Crossing Borders	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dacg.dk ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	DACG \| Danish Anti-Counterfeiting Group	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
act-for-life.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Act for Life \| Bliv involveret nu – bidrag til forandring	da	non-profit-organizations Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
actionforreliefanddevelopmentard.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	ARD — Action For Relief And Development	da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danskefonde.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Danske Fonde – Forum for mindre og mellemstore fonde i Danmark	da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
wecircle.io ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	WeCircle \|	da	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aplaceintheheart.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	a place in the heart	da	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.