similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to notrademark.de

Notrademark alternatives & similar sites

Zurück in die Heimat – von msquare — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ettis.at ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	ettis.at – The Ettis home page	Austria de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devbase.at ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	devbase.at – by Thomas Reitmayr	Austria de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
derkompass.at ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	derkompass.at – by digitalerkompass.at	Austria de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
orca-world.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	ORCA-WORLD – Version 4.0	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcmaier.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	mcmaier.net – Martin Maier	Germany~ de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jateq.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	jateq.de – Willkommen bei JATeQ!	Austria de	technology-and-computing Weebly WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
nmx.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	NMX.DE – Why not.	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uidlabs.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	User Experience Innovations – Service- und Produktideen für die Zukunft	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mebeim.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Marco Bonelli – @mebeim	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meinleben.digital ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Startseite – BASIC thinking	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jhop.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	About Me – Julian Fietkau	Austria de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
infocms.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	XOPX.de – Create your World	Austria de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
basicthinking.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Startseite – BASIC thinking	Austria de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitaleinitiativen.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Plattform für digitale Initiativen – Gemeinsam bauen, tüfteln und lernen. In Dornbirn.	Austria de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
servicenotnow.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Closing Projects – IT-Native	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quality-and-gender.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Informatik und Gesellschaft – Private Homepage Prof. Dr. M. Herpers	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
yuuguu.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Yuuguu.com – Technologie Und Mehr	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nerdlangen.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	nerdlangen – Für digitale Mündigkeit. In Erlangen und Umgebung.	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.