similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to nosu.io

Nosu alternatives & similar sites

sprint — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
juniperspring.xyz ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Juniperspring	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
autismxchange.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Bigspring Hugo	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voxpopuli.click ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Voxpopuli	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deanzahacks.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	DAHacks 4.0	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myfootprintproject.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	MyFootprintProject	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skyllasoft.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	SkyllaSoft.com - Turning Ideas into Reality, One Line of Code at a Time.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acmtechsprint.fit ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ACM TechSprint 2026: Asteria \| Illuminate the Future	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zhangdamao.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ignore the Blueprint	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
moscovich.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Tomer Moscovich	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
antonalthoff.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Anton’s Blog	en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alecrodriguez.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Alec Rodriguez — Designer & Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
akhshy.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Akhshy's OS	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mmbe.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Marcos Barrera - Solution Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andypeterson.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Projects	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
nashimus.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	nashimus - Ideas, projects, and recipes.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctrlhackdel.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CTRL+HACK+DEL 2.0	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
docsastests.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Never have stale docs again \| Docs as Tests	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3hh.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	3 Hour Hacks - Build the Future	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.