similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to noogle.dev

Noogle alternatives & similar sites

Noogle - Simply find Nix API reference documentation. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
learn-k.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	K documentation	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codecraftsmen.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Code Craftsmen documentation	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
antora.guide ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Documentation as Code with Antora	en	programming-languages Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csalgorithm.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Implementation of algorithms in C#	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcbuild.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Welcome to the MC-Build Documentation! - MC-Build Documentation	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csharpbyexamples.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	C# by Examples - Simple Code Snippets	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1ma.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Write it simple - Simple programming short articles. Mostly ruby focused.	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
spartancsharp.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home Page - Spartan C#	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ne-rpc.co.uk ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	NE-RPC \| North East Remote Programming Conference	United Kingdom en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clockwise-js.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	clockWise.js - Javascript time sequence handling	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eiffel-loop.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Eiffel-Loop Sitemap	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csharp-station.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Tutorials, Links and Articles About C# \| C# Station	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
algorithms-visual.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Algorithms - description, visualization, Java code	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learningetl.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Learning ETL – Journey With Me As I Document My Snowflake Learning	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codeinclass.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Code In Class – Computer Science Curriculum for Elementary Schools	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codingfriends.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Coding Friends – Coding Friends, place for developers.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lean4.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Lean 4 - Learn Functional Programming & Theorem Proving \| lean4.dev	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
specta.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	specta-rs	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.