similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to noahosterhout.com

Noahosterhout alternatives & similar sites

Noah Osterhout — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
blockson.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	blockson ❒ webmaster	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bouquet.blue ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Epistery - bouquet.blue	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jdl.io ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	About \| Jonathan Laster	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
roadster.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Introduction - Roadster	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dougfenstermacher.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Doug Fenstermacher	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jcny.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Jordan Caroleo \| JNCY.dev( )	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meisterlala.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Meisterlala: Developer Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jcore.net ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Home - jCore - the Webmaster's Multisite CMS	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
4devtool.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	4DevTool - 95+ Tools Across the Site for Developers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bradsimon.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Brad Simon — Systems Thinker & Architecture Consultant	en	technology-and-computing Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brainstormforce.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Brainstorm Force – Tools to Build Faster WordPress Sites	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1tpp.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	1tpp - Stories of a Full Stack Developer and Penetration Tester	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ankitraj5ar.online ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Ankit Raj \| Software Engineer Portfolio (Node.js, Microservices, Kafka)	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robertaccettura.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Robert Accettura's Fun With Wordage – Robert Accettura's Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 20
bkr.family ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Jeremy's Blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blackframe.bot ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Blackframe — Automation. Authority. Execution.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
black-hammer.consulting ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Black Hammer Consulting	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blabs.space ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	B-Labs Builders \| Engineering The Decentralized Frontier	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.