similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to nicoschriever.com

Nicoschriever alternatives & similar sites

Nico Schriever — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
brentlab.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Brent Lab — Personal R&D	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cschleiden.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Christopher Schleiden	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meeg.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Chris Meagher's blog	en	technology-and-computing Storyblok	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackbishop.co ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jack Bishop \| Software Engineering Leader	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
guidrezza.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Nick Drezza \| Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 12
crishell.co ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - Chris Mitchell	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blogs.coop ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	- Co-op Digital blog	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
raees.me ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Raees Iqbal - Personal Site and Blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
donohoe.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Michael Donohoe - Product & Engineering / Media	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qbart.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Bartłomiej Wójtowicz	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rohitechlabs.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	RohiTech Labs — Building to Understand	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasonalmine.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jason Almine, notebook	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jbdk.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jbdk - All About Everything	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jcmnj.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	JCMNJ \| Projects, Guidance, and Practical Systems	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
douglasduhaime.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Douglas Duhaime	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thehappylab.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Happy Lab — We build stuff that makes us happy	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
build.parts ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	nemo.foo \| Developer, Maker, Creator	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
roboschreiber.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	roboschreiber.github.io \| Robo Schreiber	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.