similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to newmanon.com

Newmanon alternatives & similar sites

Newman On … | Daniel Newman on all kinds of things — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
stevenharman.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Steven Harman — Maker & Breaker of Things	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deltacaeli.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Tim Taber - Maker of Things	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
markwagner.biz ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Real Mark Wagner - Creating and Automating all sorts of things!	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
makestuff.blog ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Make Stuff – Build logs of small things I make	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wikidaemon.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	WikiDaemon – Cope with the Future on all Scales	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
emilioaguero.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Emilio Aguero – …all things tech	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allthingsdistributed.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	All Things Distributed	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dyladan.me ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Dyla	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deltalabs.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Daniel ONeil \| Delta Labs	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevinhegel.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Hegel - All things Infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mateos.cc ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Mateos	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ddent.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Dent -	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giwdal.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Ladwig	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kellymiyashiro.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Boring Things	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dzacarias.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Zacarias	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
endraws.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Endraws	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2color.me ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Norman - Developer, maker, and blogger	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1nine.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	All things digital - 1nine.com	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.