similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to nankankeiba.com

Nankankeiba alternatives & similar sites

南関東4競馬場｜nankankeiba.com — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Horse Racing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
netkeiba.com ↗	55 match shared topic	netkeiba ネットケイバ - 日本最大の競馬情報サービス	ja	horse-racing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oddspark.com ↗	55 match shared topic	競馬・競輪・オートレースのオッズパーク【Odds Park】	ja	horse-racing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jra.jp ↗	55 match shared topic	JRA日本中央競馬会	Japan ja	horse-racing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jra-van.jp ↗	55 match shared topic	競馬予想・競馬情報ならJRA-VAN	Japan ja	horse-racing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
e-printservice.net ↗	55 match shared topic	eプリントサービス \| コンビニで新聞・出走表がプリントできる！	ja	horse-racing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
moukaru-keiba.com ↗	55 match shared topic	よく当たる競馬予想サイトランキング｜当たる競馬予想サイト	ja	horse-racing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stgt.jp ↗	55 match shared topic	Stgt.jp – Racing Bets	Japan ja	horse-racing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
regimag.jp ↗	55 match shared topic	レジまぐ - メールマガジン・予想・ダウンロードファイルなどデジタルコンテンツの販売サイト	Japan ja	horse-racing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
horseracing.com.au ↗	85 match shared topic	Australian Horse Racing - HorseRacing.com.au	Australia en	horse-racing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arenaracingcompany.co.uk ↗	85 match shared topic	Arena Racing \| Arena Racing Company	United Kingdom en	horse-racing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kentuckyderby.com ↗	85 match shared topic	2027 Kentucky Derby & Oaks \| April 30 and May 1, 2027 \| KentuckyDerby.com	en	horse-racing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
godolphin.com ↗	85 match shared topic	Welcome to Godolphin \| Godolphin	en	horse-racing Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
equi-western.com ↗	85 match shared topic	Equi-Western.com – Conseils pour les paris	fr	horse-racing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
parkplacestable.com ↗	85 match shared topic	ParkPlaceStable.com – Horse Race Betting	en	horse-racing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
poneyclub-centreequestre-valdesaire.com ↗	85 match shared topic	PoneyClub-Centreequestre-Valdesaire.com – Stratégies de pari	fr	horse-racing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trackmaster.com ↗	85 match shared topic	TrackMaster® an Equibase Company	en	horse-racing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
slots-klub.com ↗	85 match shared topic	Slots-Klub.com – Sports Betting	en	horse-racing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
f-tpl.com ↗	30 match shared topic	《無料》ホームページテンプレート.com \| 商用可能なホームページテンプレート・レスポンシブWordPressテーマが完全無料	ja	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.