similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to nahbar.net

Nahbar alternatives & similar sites

Peter Bartmann – Autor · Blogger · Berater — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Design And Html →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
feynmatt.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Hey, ich bin Fabian! – Berater für Digitale Barrierefreiheit	de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
badredheadlady.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	badredheadlady – Persönlicher Blog	de	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rakuba.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	raKuba – Design. Beratung. Transformation.	Germany de	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dunedain-srk.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Dunedain-srk.net - Der Blog	Germany de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pennsimon.at ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	simon penn – webdesigner	Austria de	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
psho.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Peter Schwab	Germany de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boddien.biz ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	j.b Berater für digitale Medien - B2B-Portale - Internet - Usability	de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rco-kortmann.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	ma.rco-kortmann.de	Germany de	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
earthlingz.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	oers – Every blog is exactly the same.	Germany de	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
timon-goelz.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Timon Goelz Consulting – Webdesign – Fotografie – Printdesign – Beratung	de	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dersly.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Mein Blog – Mehr oder weniger Aktuelles im Wochenrhythmus	Austria de	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
fuehrer-software.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Meine Blog – Eine andere WordPress-Site.	Austria de	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mediatender.cloud ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Anmelden – MediaTender	de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rbecke.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Der Backesjung – Eine andere WordPress-Site.	Germany de	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
erhardtdesign.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	ErhardtDesign – [Webdesign]	Germany de	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baba-media.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Baba Media · Webseiten von Hand · Barbara Beeler	Switzerland de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reinhard-weiss.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	reweb – Reinhard Weiß, Fischingen	Germany de	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trade-gt.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Mein Blog	de	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.