similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to nager.at

Nager alternatives & similar sites

Tino Hager | nager.at — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
blickle.online ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Tobias Blickle – Software Specialist	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danopz.de ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Daniel Opitz - Softwaredeveloper	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meldanor.me ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Kilian Gärtner	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sitekiosk.at ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Kiosk Solution & Digital Signage \| SiteKiosk™	Austria de	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csho.de ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	CSHO.de – Christian Schniering	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bsquared-engineering.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Jens Benner \| Embedded Engineer \| Embedded Hard- & Software	de	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
swimmesberger.at ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	swimmesberger (Simon Wimmesberger) · GitHub	Austria de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
d3nexus.de ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Home \| D3nexus	Germany de	technology-and-computing Grav	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blendstylez.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Martin Maurer · blendstylez studio	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryptocrack.de ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Lukas Fleischer	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nihilkatt.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Nihilkatt_Main_Page	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cross-solution.de ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Open Source Beratung @ CROSS Solution	Germany de	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ventspire.io ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	ventSpire – Strategische Softwareentwicklung	Germany~ de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ph3.at ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	PH3	Austria de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sequality.at ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Sequality - Wir erschaffen Embedded User Experience	Austria de	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sith.at ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	axelheer (Axel Heer) · GitHub	Austria de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quickglance.at ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Quick Glance At: Agile Engineering	Austria de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
2scale.net ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	2scale DevOps, Agile Softwareentwicklung, Consulting // Deutschland	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.