similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to myghostcode.com

Myghostcode alternatives & similar sites

GhostCode Security — Security for AI-Built SaaS — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
flowpatrol.ai ↗	74 match 2 shared topics	Flowpatrol — Security Scanning for AI-Built Apps	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 10
cybersymbioticsecurity.org ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Symbiotic Security - End to End security for AI coding	United States~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mysecuritysymbiotic.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Symbiotic Security - End to End security for AI coding	United States~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
e3ss.co.uk ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	AI Website Vetting \| Security & Legal Review for AI-Built SaaS \| E3SS	United Kingdom en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keyboundary.dev ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	TAP — Security and identity for AI agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
astrix.security ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Identity Security for AI Agents & NHIs \| Astrix Security	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ztklabs.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	ztkLabs — Cybersecurity for AI	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
defenddevs.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	DefendDevs — AI-Powered Code Security Audits	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neogriffin.dev ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	NeoGriffin — Security Proxy for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mysilmaril.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Silmaril \| Runtime Security for AI	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silmaril.dev ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Silmaril \| Runtime Security for AI	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silmarilaccess.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Silmaril \| Runtime Security for AI	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silmarilhello.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Silmaril \| Runtime Security for AI	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silmarilhq.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Silmaril \| Runtime Security for AI	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silmarilhub.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Silmaril \| Runtime Security for AI	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silmarilmeeting.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Silmaril \| Runtime Security for AI	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silmarilnetwork.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Silmaril \| Runtime Security for AI	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silmarilops.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Silmaril \| Runtime Security for AI	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.