Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfilePricingAI Report

Sites similar to mudfish.net

Mudfish alternatives & similar sites

MUDFISH: Acceleration As a Service — 9 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Computer Networking →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
mind-wave.tech 33 match
1 shared topics
Mindwave | Digital Innovation Studio no software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
tlksoftware.com 31 match
1 shared topics
TLK Software ved Kristoffersen - Skreddersydde Digitale Løsninger no software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
blanq.digital 31 match
1 shared topics
BLANQ — IT-løsninger & skreddersydd programvare i Norge no software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
tozempire.com 30 match
1 shared topics
TozEmpire — Premium Software Marketplace no software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
blankspot.org 30 match
1 shared topics
Christoffer Cena presenterar: Blank Spot - ein stad på verdsveven no software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
opteraoti.com 24 match
1 shared topics
OPTERA | Operational Task Intelligence for Warehouse Operations no software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
ddmstage.com 22 match
1 shared topics
Change Detection no technology-and-computing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
lavamilk.org 21 match
1 shared topics
Lavamilk AS - AI-drevet programvare for helsesektoren no artificial-intelligence robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
badpuppet.com 20 match
1 shared topics
Bad Puppet™ no software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.