similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to move-patterns.com

Move Patterns alternatives & similar sites

Introduction - Move Patterns: Design Patterns for Resource Based Programming — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mozart2.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Mozart Programming System	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ananke.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	The Ananke Programming Language	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kslng.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	KSL; An experimental programming language	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kullna.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	The Kullna Programming Language Project	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learnyapl.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Learn YAPL – Learn Yet Another Programming Language	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apibook.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	API Design for C++	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kite-lang.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	vodofrede/kite-lang: The Kite Programming Language - Codeberg.org	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
programmingwithtsatsu.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Programming with Tsatsu	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
professorfontanez.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Programming Corner	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
proglessons.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Welcome Page - ProgrammingLessons	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
programming-books.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Essential Programming Books	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lawyerswhoride.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	My Coding Path Blog - A resource hub for individuals learning to code, offering tutorials, resources, and guides for various programming languages	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
programmingdd.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Programming DD	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adaic.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Ada Resource Association - News and resource for the Ada programming language	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
koevoet.biz ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Programming languages for desktop and mobile development \| Koevoet.biz	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zparacha.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	zParacha.com – Effective Programming Tips	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bsprogram.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	BsProgram - A Programming platform	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
programmingabc.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Programming Tutorials for Beginners	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.