similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to moogmarken.de

Moogmarken alternatives & similar sites

Home - MOOG MARKEN — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
positoons.de ↗	66 match 3 shared topics	Character Design, Markenfiguren & Key Visuals	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5a-grafik.design ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	Home - Tamara Haake \| Grafikdesign - Konzeption	de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bpdd.com ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	Home - bartels + drescher \| designagentur	de	design Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
employer-branding-radar.de ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	h&h – Markenentwicklung und Employer Branding: h&h – Markenentwicklung und Employer Branding	Germany de	design TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ecosense.de ↗	63 match 3 shared topics	ecosense - media & communication	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brand-identity.org ↗	63 match 3 shared topics	clearbrand Zürich - brand identity works	de	design Prismic	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
brand-identity.net ↗	63 match 3 shared topics	clearbrand Zürich - brand identity works	de	design Prismic	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
absolutagentur.ch ↗	63 match 3 shared topics	Absolut Agentur	Switzerland de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
bludovsky.net ↗	63 match 3 shared topics	bludovsky – Büro für Markengestaltung – Kommunikationsdesign	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
echoundflut.de ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Echo & Flut \| Markenkommunikation und Design · klassisch & digital	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rangnamen.de ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	rang + namen - Agentur für Kommunikation und Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ballymasera.ch ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	BallyMasera AG – Identity Branding, Zürich, Schweiz	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomas-otte.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Home: Thomas Otte Visuelle Kommunikation	de	design TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pranding.de ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Strategische Designagentur aus Bayern \| Pranding	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reinlinge.de ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Agentur für Design und Kommunikation in Mainz – fejn	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brand-gravity.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	XMSL extramediumsmallarge – Brand und Corporate Design	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
torbica.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	TORBICA Design, Branding, Employer Branding Agentur Hannover	de	design WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
buronord.ch ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Büro Nord \| Agentur für visuelle Kommunikation \| Grafik \| Küssnacht \| Kanton Schwyz	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.