similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to mkme.org

Mkme alternatives & similar sites

HOME – Sharing projects and ideas to change our world together — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
reesskennedy.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Reess Kennedy \| Ideas, sharings, projections	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ianmarsh.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ian Marsh – Ideas and Ideals	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rd10.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	RD10 Engineering Projects	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caseyschmitz.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Casey Schmitz \| Projects and such.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
casualcoders.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Casual Coders \| Projects and Podcast	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikebaltar.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Mike Baltar – Ephemeris and other projects	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kareemnayfeh.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Kareem Nayfeh's Blog - Engineering and Coding Projects	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quicksilvertech.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Quicksilver Technologies \| Tech Blog & Bringing Projects To Life	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
picnicprojects.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Picnic Projects – Sunday afternoon tinkering	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quailprojects.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Quail Projects - Building digital tools and more.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ejectprojects.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Eject Projects \| Home	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
astorian.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Nicklas Astorian — Thoughts and Projects	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
michelvanvliet.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Michel van Vliet – IT Blog – Let's share and learn together!	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
peterannabel.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Peter Annabel – Bringing everyday life and technology together.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
picricket.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	piCricket – Projects for your Cricket Club	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
changeunit.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home - Change Unit	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
el-gadi.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Yousif El-Gadi \| Projects, Tools & Ideas	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cworld0.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home • CWorld Site	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.