Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI Report

Sites similar to mitos.me

Mitos alternatives & similar sites

mitos | leading to solutions | Coaching Leadership Change — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
bachmannleadership.de 70 match
3 shared topics
Bachmann Leadership – Katrin Bachmann Germany de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
beratung-ds.de 68 match
3 shared topics
Startseite - DS Beratung | Coaching | Training - Daniela Philipps Germany de management-consulting-industryJoomla robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
curatys.de 67 match
3 shared topics
CURATYS International - Leading in executive search Germany de executive-leadership-and-managementTYPO3 robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
dorotheekaiser.de 67 match
3 shared topics
Dr. Dorothee Kaiser | Coaching und Beratung - DK Coaching Germany de management-consulting-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
andreastrasser.de 67 match
3 shared topics
Home - Strasser | Personal- und Organisationsentwicklung Germany de human-resourcesWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
albrecht-beratung.com 66 match
3 shared topics
Albrecht Beratung | Beratung, Training, Coaching | Albrecht-Beratung Dresden de management-consulting-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
comweit.com 66 match
3 shared topics
comweit. nachhaltige Team Coachings, Change & Transformation de human-resourcesWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
basma-geigenmueller.de 66 match
3 shared topics
Basma Geigenmüller *Coach | Consultant | Speaker* Germany de management-consulting-industrySquarespaceMagento robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
dr-ulrike-koester.de 66 match
3 shared topics
Dr. Ulrike Köster - Coaching für Personal und Führungskräfte Germany de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
dl-ob.de 65 match
3 shared topics
Home - Dr. Daniel Lachmann Organisationsberatung Germany de management-consulting-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
kolibri-enterprise.ch 65 match
3 shared topics
Krisenmanagement, Stressmanagement & Coaching | Kolibri Enterprise Switzerland de executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
arneklein.de 65 match
3 shared topics
Arne Klein – Praxis für Personal- und Organisationsentwicklung Germany de management-consulting-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
bandao.de 65 match
3 shared topics
BANDAO | Next Generation Leadership Germany de human-resourcesWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
von-amelunxen.com 65 match
3 shared topics
Sabine Amelunxen-Huber: Ihr Ansprechpartner für Mitarbeiter-Training, IDD-Ausbildung, Führungskräfte-Coaching & Teamentwicklung de management-consulting-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
overlack.net 65 match
3 shared topics
Home de human-resources robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
dr-klaudia-holzaht.de 64 match
3 shared topics
Dr. Klaudia Holzaht, Leistungs- Gesundheitsentwicklung Germany de human-resources robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
businessexpert.ch 64 match
3 shared topics
Coaching und Seminare für Personal und Kader | Zürich Switzerland de executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
dr-ulla-nagel.com 64 match
3 shared topics
Personal- und Unternehmensentwicklung | Dr. Ulla Nagel GmbH Germany~ de management-consulting-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.