similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to mitforschen.org

Mitforschen alternatives & similar sites

Die Plattform für Citizen Science | mit:forschen! — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
forscherkiste.ch ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Forscherkiste	Switzerland de	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs-communication.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - CS Science Communication GmbH	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alparctica.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	AlpArctica – Alpine & Arctic Science Communication	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gfbg.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	GFBG - Gesellschaft für Forschung auf biophysikalischen Grenzgebieten	Switzerland de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brilliant-reserve.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Brillante Entdeckungen – Verstehen, Staunen, Forschen	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fingertip.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	fingertip hands-on science \| making science accessible by focusing on user perspectives	Switzerland de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
flaviaschlegel.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	flaviaschlegel.com – Science Governance Partnership	Switzerland de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
flaviaschlegel.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	flaviaschlegel.com – Science Governance Partnership	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acrai.at ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Rat für Forschung, Wissenschaft, Innovation und Technologieentwicklung	Austria de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mikroskope.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	BRESSER Mikroskope & Zubehör für Labor & Schule	Germany~ de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ascina.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	ASCINA - Austrian Scientists & Scholars in North America	Austria de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cheerful-battery.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Wissensfunken – Entdecken Sie spannende Fakten aus Kosmos, Technik und Biologie	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexandria-magazin.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Dein Magazin für Wissenschaft - alexandria	Austria de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prometheus-tv.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Prometheus - Der Wissenschaftssender für Baden-Württemberg	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystal-stories.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	PaleoStories Onlineshop - Fossilien und Mineralien kaufen - PaleoStories - Onlineshop für Fossilien & Mineralien	de	science Gambio	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
floating-lidar.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Floating-LiDAR – Floating-LiDAR knowledge from a scientific perspective	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcflown.net ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	F. Wetzel - Homepage	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
femwiss.ch ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Verein Feministische Wissenschaft Schweiz - FemWiss	Switzerland de	science Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.