similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to miswritings.org

Miswritings alternatives & similar sites

Miswritings – thinking outloud — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
outloudthinker.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	OutloudThinker - Just thinking out loud	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designthinkingaloud.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Tech Thinking Aloud	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinkinginbytes.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Thinking In Bytes	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devopsthinking.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	DevOps Thinking – by Paweł Muszyński	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adventuresintesting.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Adventures in Testing – Breaking things that matter	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adventuresintesting.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Adventures in Testing – Breaking things that matter	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinkingintech.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Thinking in Tech \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 2
thinkonlabs.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Think On Labs – Thoughtfully Solving Problems	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
simonstockings.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Simon Stockings – "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants"	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesgolick.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Writing \| James Golick	en	technology-and-computing Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamiewadley.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jamie Wadley’s Blog – I've Been Thinking About You and Me	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamcampbell.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sporadic writings by Adam Campbell	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalbydent.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	DigitalByDent – All things digital	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bojankezastampanje.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	BKS – Technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
devanhemmings.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Devan Hemmings — Builder, Systems Thinker & Guide	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jc00ke.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Musings of something or another	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schematicanalysis.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Make Things Happen!	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesrichards.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Programming and the GeoWeb \| writings by james richards	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.