similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to minepilot.com

Minepilot alternatives & similar sites

MinePilot | Machine-Collected Evidence for Underground Mining — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jaxonparrott.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Jaxon Parrott \| Machine Relations Founder	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3brain.ai ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	3BrainAI \| Trusted Data Plane for regulated evidence workflows	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marygenai.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	MaryGenAI \| Cannabinoid Evidence Curation	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boldvideo.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Bold — Video intelligence for coaching programs	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agenthook.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	AgentHook · Open runtime evidence for AI agents	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agent-hook.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	AgentHook · Open runtime evidence for AI agents	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meldhq.ai ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Where Minds and Machines Meld \| Meld	United States~ en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentciv.ai ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	AgentCiv — Collective Machine Intelligence	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
memgpt.ai ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Letta \| Machines that learn	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ai-lab-brain.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	AI Lab Brain \| Lab-First Evidence-Based Decision Layer	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
agent-net.ai ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	AgentNet \| Infrastructure for the Machine Web	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dendrite.ai ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dendrite \| Machine Learning and Business Intelligence	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
galenuniversal.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	GALEN Universal — Speak Any Language. Machines Understand.	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mechinvariants.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mech Invariants — No invariant without an evidence bundle	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skhnv.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Roman A Sukhanov \| Machine Learning Engineer \| Software Developer	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sauroai.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sauro — Carbon Evidence, Ready	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adityaagarwal.me ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Aditya Agarwal \| Machine Learning Engineer	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agilord.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Agilord: a machine intelligence company in Budapest, Hungary.	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.