similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to mindquest.info

Mindquest alternatives & similar sites

MindQuest – Science : Research : Language : Media — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
morphostate.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Morphostate \| Researchers in science and technology	de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
europeanscienceclub.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	European Science Club	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culture-and-science.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Culture and Science	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diamond-research-center.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	German New Diamond Research Center GmbH - Start	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diamond-research-center.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	German New Diamond Research Center GmbH - Start	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denkfest.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Denkfest – Denkfest	Switzerland de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs-communication.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - CS Science Communication GmbH	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hescor-project.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	HESCOR: Human & Earth System Coupled Research	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
gene-abc.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	SimplyScience: Home	Switzerland de	science TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
geneabc.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	SimplyScience: Home	Switzerland de	science TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
decisionneuroscience.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Decision Neuroscience - From Neurons to Societies	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daniela-wuensch.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Daniela Wuensch - Historian of Science / Wissenschaftshistorikerin	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielawuensch.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Daniela Wuensch - Historian of Science / Wissenschaftshistorikerin	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apecs-germany.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	APECS Germany – German National Committee of the Association of Polar Early Career Scientists	Germany de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apecsgermany.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	APECS Germany – German National Committee of the Association of Polar Early Career Scientists	Germany de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
movingimagescience.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Bewegtbildwissenschaft and more! - movingimagescience.com	de	science Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silatec-innovation.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	SILATEC – Silatec Innovationen	Germany~ de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mindspark-publishing.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	25 Wissenskarten – Schneller Einstieg in wissenschaftliche Themen	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.