similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to mikespsyche.com

Mikespsyche alternatives & similar sites

Mike's Psyche | Swift and maybe more? — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mbmccoy.dev ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Mike's Notebook	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cctplus.dev ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	CCT+ \| Code. Coffee. Tech. and more	en	programming-languages Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zuchos.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Software development and much more... \| Zuchos.com	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dccodecoffee.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	DC Code and Coffee	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alpayc.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Alpay Calalli	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ibrewcode.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	I Brew Code \| Developing my life	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
delport.ca ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Ramblings and Musing	Canada en	technology-and-computing Statamic	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4dpiecharts.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	4D Pie Charts \| Scientific computing, data viz and general geekery, with examples in R and MATLAB.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iamin.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Swift dev articles	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ianoxley.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Ian Oxley \| Notes on software development and other miscellany.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
forward-thinking-it.co.uk ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Round the loop and back	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learningtopi.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Learning to Pi - Programming Python on SBC's and Microcontrollers	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brianpos.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	using Hl7.Fhir; – Making FHIR work in your projects with minimal effort, and maximum conformance	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learnitwithben.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	BenSvin’s Portfolio \| Projects and Documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kelseymckenna.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Kelsey McKenna \| Blog about software and stuff	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5error.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	5 Error \| Software, stories, and the world they're built in.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
siraben.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	siraben’s musings \| Writing proofs and programs.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kellybrownmusic.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Kelly Brown's Personal site	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.