similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to mikebifulco.com

Mikebifulco alternatives & similar sites

Mike Bifulco | Developer Advocate & Startup Founder | Mike Bifulco — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
devgrid.co.uk ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Cutting edge development for startups and enterprises \| DevGrid	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eksno.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Jonas Lindberg — CTO & Co-founder of Startino	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikelpaz.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Michael Paz — Engineering Head \| Startup CTO & Founding Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
asyncforge.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	AsyncForge - Unlimited Software Development Subscription	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
charlieswinhoe.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Charlie Swinhoe \| Founder & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gurucrate.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Build-Ready Startup Blueprints \| GuruCrate	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
astrophagelabs.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Astrophage Labs — The studio behind FounderHQ.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
servitostudio.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Multipurpose Startup Laravel Script.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shaharse.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	SHAHARSE	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keelroot.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	keelroot — Mission-critical software for funded founders	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikechirokas.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Mike Chirokas	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctopartner.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	CTOpartner \| CTO-as-a-Service & Production Systems Partner	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aadesh.info ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Aadesh Kheria	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quan2m.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Allison Mahmood	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cherevatyy.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Oleg Cherevatyy - Personal Blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ashudubey.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Weekly discussions on product, growth and web3 by an ex-Linkedin product leader and entrepreneur, Ashu Dubey	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mindblowords.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Mindblowords — Mindful Digital Product Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eexpression.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Bentley Davis	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.