similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to microscope-detective.com

Microscope Detective alternatives & similar sites

How To Choose And Use Microscopes - Springtime In My Soul — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
martinmicroscope.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Martin Microscope	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jbmicroscope.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	JB Microscope	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
singascope.info ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	SingaScope \| A Singapore-Wide Microscopy Infrastructure Network	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
singascope.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	SingaScope \| A Singapore-Wide Microscopy Infrastructure Network	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
singascope.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	SingaScope \| A Singapore-Wide Microscopy Infrastructure Network	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jangsheldon.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	History of Science – Exploring the evolution of science, from astrology to astronomy, from alchemy to chemistry, into the microscopic world.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sciscopes.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	SciScope - Unveiling the Stories of Science \| SciScope	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scienceandempire.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	SCIEMP - Science and Empire Commission	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schaefer-scientific.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Innovative Solutions for Science and Engineering - Schaefer Scientific	en	science WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
martinriemer.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Time and Space – Research Group	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boneblogger.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Boneblogger: Science and the outdoors	en	science WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonsfoundation.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Advancing Research in Basic Science and Mathematics \| Simons Foundation	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonsfdn.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Advancing Research in Basic Science and Mathematics \| Simons Foundation	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1dimensional.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	— Behavior and Culture in One Dimension – Official Site	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sciencethread.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Science Thread - Science and Tech News	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sciencefaircenter.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	School Water Test Kits for Science engineering and monitoring	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csh-asia.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Cold Spring Harbor Asia	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scienceandmorality.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Science and Morality \| Exploring the grounding of morality in science.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.