similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to microci.dev

Microci alternatives & similar sites

microCI Documentation — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
drupal-translation.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	ICanLocalize Documentation	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
weather-plus.dev ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Weather Plus Documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
waypnt.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	NovAtel Documentation Portal	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
secretofsix.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	NovAtel Documentation Portal	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
secretof6.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	NovAtel Documentation Portal	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oyhy.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	⚡ N8N Workflow Documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sefiraat.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Sefiraat \| Sefiraat's Addons Documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neonkoala.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Neonkoala - personal blog and documentation	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
masoniteproject.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Introduction and Installation \| Masonite Documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
markeddocs.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	MarkedDocs - Documentation that works as hard as you do	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
seaturtle.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	@seaturtle/graphql-model-directives 0.3.0 \| Documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simplywriting.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	SimplyWriting — Technical Documentation & Content Strategy	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
securedocsharing.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	PandaDoc for Developers — API Reference, SDK, and Documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomas-pk.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Thomas’ technical notes — Thomas' Notes 1.0 documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scottjbarnett.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Scott Barnett - Current Documents	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
weappon.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Pagination.com - The fastest path from data to documents	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
seewhatchanged.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	See What Changed \| Compare Text Documents	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mathijspanhuijsen.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mathijs Panhuijsen – Head of Documentation, Senior Content Systems Architect, Senior Technical Writer	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.