similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to mgreene.org

Mgreene alternatives & similar sites

Mike's Random Stuff – A bunch of miscellaneous stuff — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
dierksen.net ↗	37 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Dierksen \| Just a landing page and a bunch of redirection.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sathyasekaran.com ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	Sathya Sekaran – Engineering, Psychology, and Random Stuff	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
derekschauland.com ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	DerekSchauland(dot)com – A blog for stuff, things, and learning	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 5
jamesquest.info ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	Quest's Random Thoughts	en	technology-and-computing Tumblr	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
outatimeprojects.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Outatime Projects - various random projects	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schmuuth.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Musing on Stuff – Just the 'usual nonsense'	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
braceta.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Geekish Stuff	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simplyaboutcode.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	SimplyAboutCode \| Software stuff in plain english	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
papaface.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	PapaFace.comPapaFace.com \| Interesting stuff guaranteed!	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jacobplatt.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	jacob's stuff	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
8d-designs.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	8D Designs – I make stuff	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devops-stuff.dev ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Devops Stuff	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jeffcrews.net ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Random Thoughts of Jeff Crews	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wawawum.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Wawawum.com – Some IT stuff	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devdiscoveries.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dev Discoveries – On a mission of exploration…	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jempire.org ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	James Steele Empire Blog – my thoughts and stuff	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xmalotru.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Malotru's Stuffs	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesdoesdatastuff.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	James's Data Blog – A place for data and analysis!	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.