similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to mendcomm.org

Mendcomm alternatives & similar sites

Mendeleev Communications — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
decodecomms.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Decode Communications	en	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alphabetscience.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	That Science Gang \| Science Communication	en	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alluviumcollective.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Alluvium \| Science Communication Collective	en	science Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
briannabowman.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Brianna Bowman \| Marine science communication	en	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
asc.asn.au ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	The Australian Science Communicators	Australia en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kellyemckinnon.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Kelly E McKinnon \| Scientist, Educator, and Communications Specialist	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lenorekpedicord.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Lenore K Pedicord \| Science Communicator	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
leonorsierra.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Leonor Sierra – Science writing, editing and communications training	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3mbed.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	3MBED – Science Communication & Design for Biotech and Research	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jx-portfolio.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Jessica Xhumari \| Astrobiology Science Communicator	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
minpubs.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Mineralogical Publications	United States~ en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drdavidslade.co.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dr David J. Slade - A scientist and science communicator	United Kingdom en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cassandrawardle.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cassandra Wardle – Researcher, consultant & communicator	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
decisivescientific.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Decisive Scientific Applications	Australia~ en	science Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
frogheart.ca ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	FrogHeart \| Commentary about nanotech, science policy and communication, society, and the arts	Canada en	science WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cerisecherrypublications.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cerise Cherry Publications \| Home	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cswsalinas.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	community science workshop	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medianeuroscience.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Media Neuroscience Lab \| Research and Teaching at the Intersection of Communication, Technology, and Neuroscience	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.