similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to medbenchmark.org

Medbenchmark alternatives & similar sites

GitHub - alexgoodell/medbenchmark: public repo of all available medicine and health-related QA sets · GitHub — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mediadrop.video ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	GitHub - mediadrop/mediadrop: A video, audio and podcast publication platform written in Python. · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
k3sup.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	GitHub - alexellis/k3sup: bootstrap K3s over SSH in < 60s 🚀 · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
memowy.ai ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	GitHub - AkshatGiri/memowy · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meetable.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	GitHub - aaronpk/Meetable: an event listing website · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
minard.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	apatrida (Jason Reid Minard) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
traveler.io ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	alexvhicks (Alex Hicks) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dbgenis.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	davege1107 (David) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
treadspan.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	GitHub - blak3r/treadspan · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mechanized.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	BrianFrisch · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debugdemocracy.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Debug Democracy · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cassler.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	dcassler (Dan Cassler) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brainst0rm.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	GitHub - BrainSt0rm-team/BrainSt0rm · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dcrdev.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	dcrdev (Dominic Robinson) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fixtiktok.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	GitHub - okdargy/fxTikTok: Fix stale and unresponsive TikTok embeds on Discord with just s/i/n · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mathieudenoel.be ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	OrionC3 (Mathieu D) · GitHub	Belgium en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carpark.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	mbarton (Michael Barton) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pro-graham.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	GrahamBlanshard (Graham) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonsoriano.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	simon0191 (Simon Soriano) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.