similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to mcintyreclassaction.com

Mcintyreclassaction alternatives & similar sites

McIntyre v. RealPage, Inc., Case No. 2:18-cv-03934-CFK — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Law →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
kangclassaction.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Kang v. Credit Bureau Connection, Inc., Case No: 1:18-cv-01359	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
deceasedreportsuit.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Scroggins v. LexisNexis FL, Case No. 3:22-cv-00545-MHL-SLS (U.S. District Court, E.D. Virginia)	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
caway2gofeeclassaction.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Paula Sparkman v. Comerica Bank et al. – U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California \| Case No. 2:24-cv-01206-DJC-DMC	en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meggittsafetyemploymentlawsuit.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Salvador Ochoa and Hermelinda Aguilar v. CKE Restaurants Holdings, Inc., Carl’s Jr. Restaurants LLC, Carl’s Jr. Funding LLC, Case Nos. BC623041 & BC686601	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tristardatasettlement.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Riggs, et al. v. TRISTAR Insurance Group, Inc. – TULSA COUNTY DISTRICT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA \| Case No. CJ-2025-00745	United States~ en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcdcteargasclassaction.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Davis et al. v. Multnomah County et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-2041-SB – Davis et al. v. Multnomah County et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-2041-SB	en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
franciscanhealthnurses.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Graves v. Franciscan Alliance, Inc.	United States~ en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcintyrelaw.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	McIntyre Law PC \| Accident Attorneys in OKC & Nationwide	en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csacsettlement.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Case Home: CSAC, INC. v SADE M. CRAWFORD	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mindbodymergerlitigation.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home \| In Re Mindbody, Inc., Merger Litigation	United States~ en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cawineclassactionsettlement.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Carla Blackshear v. California Fine Wine & Spirits LLC; Case No.: 34-2018-00245842	United States~ en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lcdatasettlement.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Unsworth, et al., v. Lewis & Clark College – United States District Court, District of Oregon (Portland Division) \| Case No. 3:24-cv-00614	en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abanterooterplumbing.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Abante Rooter and Plumbing, Inc., (669) 295-9262	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
floridaiep.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Florida IEP Advocate, Inc.	en	law Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
signaturedatabreachsettlement.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Curtis McClean, et al. v. Signature Performance, Inc.	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mcmsettlement.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home Page - Leedeman v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.	United States~ en	law Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mileyclassactionsettlement.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Miley v. Belkin International, Inc.	United States~ en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cvcsheetsettlement.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Hawes v. Macy’s West Stores, Inc.	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.