similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to matsevers.de

Matsevers alternatives & similar sites

Mats Evers | Hello — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
nerz-ev.de ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Nerz e.V. \| Home	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ninjaneers.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Ninjaneers - Code. Collaboration. Continuity.	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
perforcesoftware.at ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Enterprise DevOps Tools \| Perforce Software	Austria de	software-and-applications Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rasptin.net ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	RasPTin® - Messtechnik, Datenerfassung, Analyse	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rbee.io ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	RBEE – Regression Benchmarking Execution Environment	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meik.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Meik Minks – Proud dad, co-founder of @inoxio, software engineer, quality expert, scrum master, Ruby coder, mac user, volleyball trainer, free athlete, aikidoka, worldtrip veteran and mountain lover	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meldanor.me ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Kilian Gärtner	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
misterpfister.net ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	misterpfister — Developer	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mixters.net ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Front Page - Mixter's NET - Ihr IT Allrounder	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hse-electronics.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	hse-electronics – competence in embedded systems	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
i9n.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	i9n - simple information!	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ideenbuch-dfb.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Ideenbuch Login	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
odet.net ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Welcome to odet.net	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ognibeni.info ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Thilo Ognibeni – Software-Architektur & IT-Beratung	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nerdlingen.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Nerdlingen – Nerdlingen	Germany de	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
netapp-monitoring.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Monitoring Plugins :: Professional Monitoring Plugins	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nextnano-gmbh.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	nextnano - Software for semiconductor nanodevices	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
niconebel.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	NMNebel (Nico Nebel) · GitHub	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.