similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to masit.ca

Masit alternatives & similar sites

Masit Communications Science Blog Mixed up with the Arts | Vancouver Technical Writer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
atdepthmarinescience.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	At Depth Marine Science Communication	en	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
philheron.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Phil Heron \| Science // education // communication	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3mbed.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	3MBED – Science Communication & Design for Biotech and Research	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
asksusano.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Science + Communication – Communicating Science Better, Faster, and Smarter	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
custom-clarity.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Custom Clarity, LLC – Medical, Science, and Technical Writing	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kielscn.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Kiel Science Communication Network - Evolving Visualizations for Evolving Health	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mendcomm.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Mendeleev Communications	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medianeuroscience.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Media Neuroscience Lab \| Research and Teaching at the Intersection of Communication, Technology, and Neuroscience	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kerimcnamara.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Keri McNamara – Freelance Science Communicator	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drdavidslade.co.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dr David J. Slade - A scientist and science communicator	United Kingdom en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
astrobonology.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Bonnie Teece – Astrobiologist and Science Communicator	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikesenese.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mike Senese — TV Host · Editor · Science Communicator	en	science Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
catchthesciencebug.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Catch the Science Bug	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
michelleajewell.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Michelle Jewell – Science Communicator \| Zoologist \| Talent	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cswsalinas.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	community science workshop	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tswrevolution.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The Science Writing Revolution	en	science Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katiereichard.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Katie Reichard – Neuroscientist, Policy Specialist, Science Communicator	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
michelesolis.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Michele Solis – science writer	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.